• Dogue's Home
    • Dogue's United Kingdom
  • Dogue's Services
    • Dogue's Training
    • Group Classes
    • Doga Classes
    • Dog Parkour
    • Seminars & Conferences
    • Therapy Programs
    • Workshops
  • Dogue Academy
  • Dogue's Gaby
    • Dogue's Colleagues
  • Dogue's Publishing
  • Dogue's Blog
  • Dogue's Store
    • Creative Dog Merch
  • Dogue's Broholmer
    • Broholmer Breeding
    • Broholmer Pedigree
    • Broholmer Journey
    • Broholmer Merch
  • Dogue Français
    • Dogue Blogue
    • Atelier de Formation
    • Cours de Doga
    • Wolf Park

Dogue Shop

  • Dogue's Home
    • Dogue's United Kingdom
  • Dogue's Services
    • Dogue's Training
    • Group Classes
    • Doga Classes
    • Dog Parkour
    • Seminars & Conferences
    • Therapy Programs
    • Workshops
  • Dogue Academy
  • Dogue's Gaby
    • Dogue's Colleagues
  • Dogue's Publishing
  • Dogue's Blog
  • Dogue's Store
    • Creative Dog Merch
  • Dogue's Broholmer
    • Broholmer Breeding
    • Broholmer Pedigree
    • Broholmer Journey
    • Broholmer Merch
  • Dogue Français
    • Dogue Blogue
    • Atelier de Formation
    • Cours de Doga
    • Wolf Park

Viewing: Behaviour - View all posts

​From Yoga to Doga 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT
Doga has been around for many years in the United States, and many people claim to have "invented" the human-dog practice. The shift from yoga to Doga was inevitable and if you stop for a moment to think about it, most asanas come from the animal world: upward dog, downward dog, cat, cow, fish, cobra, etc.

Doga has been around for many years in the United States, and many people claim to have "invented" the human-dog practice. The Doga practice we have established at the Dogue Shop was a natural and original approach meant to change your philosophy about dogs. We do not use dogs as accessories, on the contrary, dogs learn to practice yoga with their human. 
 
Yoga is a philosophy, not an exercise routine. According to Patanjali's eight limbs of yoga, the asana practice, or poses, is one part of the enlightenment process. We developed Doga based on philosophy, not the poses. Our Doga practice focuses on doing asanas with your dog as a routine, not as an accessory. The doga approach we teach involves breathing, self-awareness, poses, respect, control of the senses, and concentration. We even guide students through meditation in the presence of dogs.
 

The Eight Limbs of Yoga
Yama :  Universal morality
Niyama :  Personal observances
Asanas :  Body postures
Pranayama :  Breathing exercises, and control of prana
Pratyahara :  Control of the senses
Dharana :  Concentration and cultivating inner perceptual awareness
Dhyana :  Devotion, Meditation on the Divine
Samadhi :  Union with the Divine

A New Vision 
Because the Dogue Shop likes to Think Outside the Box, we did not want to place dogs in strange positions, nor did we want to exclude certain breeds based on their size. Doga is really about developing and deepening the human-dog relationship based on social cognitive theory. The connection deepens the relationship and the relationship deepens the ability to work and solve problems in a secure and relaxed environment. 
 
The topic of social cognitive theory was discussed in Reinforce Resilience. In the article, we discussed how to reinforce resilience through a different approach. Doga is the ultimate training practice in which a person learns to teach, bond, enjoy, and share an activity meant to keep both participants in the present moment. Doga, just like yoga, is a philosophy. Furthermore, doga is a low-impact training practice available to all. It can be practiced inside or out, and will certainly make participants laugh.

We encourage you to try Doga and start doing yoga with your dog, but most of all we encourage people to try and see their human-dog relationships in a new way. Canis Familiaris has been our working partner for hundreds of years, maybe it's time to step back and acknowledge that, although times have changed, we can still work with them in new creative ways. Give your dog a job. Give your dog a Doga job.

Source
http://www.expressionsofspirit.com/yoga/eight-limbs.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2479226/Yoga-dogs-JILLY-JOHNSON-tries-doga--14st-Great-Dane.html
http://www.catherinemann.com/doga-yoga-wa-dog/
http://www.abebooks.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/14/doga-yoga-for-dogs/

11/12/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour, Training

Think Outside The Box 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

The catch phrase think outside the box means to think in new ways in order to release one's creative potential. In the dog training world, think outside the box means to stop training with traditional punishment based methods and let new positive training ideas develop. Discussions are taking place all over the world about dominance, submission, and the excessive use of punishment in dog training; I urge you to join the discussion.
 
Traditional punishment based training models stipulate dogs form packs and establish hierarchies based on dominance and submission. At the top of the hierarchy, we find the most dominant subjects followed by their subservient conspecifics. The dominant animal, AKA alpha, controls all the resources. Traditional trainers take this model and apply it to domestic dog training. They claim dogs seek the alpha position within the human family unit, and dogs will do anything to get to the top. In other words, the dog wants to control humans and all available resources. Trai
ners that believe in dominance also claim dogs must submit to humans, if they do not, dogs must be placed in a submissive position till they surrender (calm down).

If this were true, why do dogs tolerate our presence? Canis Familiaris can exert approximately five hundred pounds of pressure per square inch, so why not just kill us and be done with it? Why display appeasement and avoidance signals towards us? The reason is simple, dogs do not want total domination, if they did, they would avoid humans all together or gang-up and kill us all.

Furthermore, dogs do not live in packs, nor do dominant subjects strive to control other individuals and available resources. Dominance is defined as what an individual wants more than the other at a particular point in time and the want can change, and usually does, at any moment. Dominance is really about confidence, not aggression. To push the discussion further, those who keep thinking within the box have not yet learned that submission (all three types) is always voluntary. You cannot force an individual, especially from another species, to submit because submission is the act of surrendering your Self. No living organism, human or non human, can make another living organism surrender its Self.

Dominance and submission are words that describe a group of behaviours. Anger and fear are emotions expressed as aggression and fearfulness. Behaviour is simply an expression of emotion, so dog training is really about changing emotions, not behaviour. My question to the reader is why does a dog trainer keep thinking in the box? Why not challenge yourself and think outside the box? The dog stopped being a wolf fifteen thousand years ago, so maybe the time has come for us to let go of the romantic idea that dogs are domestic wolves. Maybe the time has come for us to accept that the dog is, in fact, just a dog. 

11/05/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour, Training

Canine Comunication 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT
What is communication?
Dictionaries state: 

1. The ability to communicate, to establish a relation with others, which brings me to the word communicate. 
2. To give knowledge, sharing with someone. 
3. To be in a relationship, in contact, or corresponding with someone. 

One can conclude, from these definitions, that we communicate with our dogs; however, what are we really telling them? Is there concept of dominance the same as ours?  
 
Let us look at the Alpha Roll as an example. Does turning Fido on his back and holding him there say: I am Alpha, submit to me, or else! or Periodically, I will scare you, with no apparent reason, by tossing you on your back until you become inhibited. If you chose option two, you are right. Sometimes, what we say to Fido is a question of interpretational assumption, not communication. Dominance is an intra-specific concept. In order to dominate a dog, one must be able to talk the same language. In the case of human-dog communication, this means lift your tail, pivot your ears or raise your hackles. These behaviours are impossible to display if you are human; therefore, no communication has occurred.

I have never seen a dog, or wolf, take his adversary by the scruff of the neck, flip him on his back an hold him there until he submitted. Submission is always VOLUNTARY. If one dog does not submit, they fight. Dogs have a complex language and it is our responsibility to move away from assumption and study canine language. To illustrate this point, let us look at the following example.

An elephant and a buffalo challenge one another in order to access a water hole. I ask you, who dominates whom? The answer is neither nor and both at the same time. In their respective heads, the elephant and buffalo are both displaying species specific dominance behaviours. In this situation, there is no communication since the definition states: establishing a relation with others, being in a relationship. 

In our example, the buffalo tries to dominate the elephant by lowering his head and showing his horns. The elephant displays dominance by opening his ears and raising his trunk. Both animals demonstrate dominance, yet no one understands and backs down. Who wins you ask, the answer is simple, the biggest of the two or the one who is most thirsty. From the human perspective, we can clearly see communication does not occur. The buffalo does not dominate the elephant because the latter does not understand the behaviours displayed. With this new understanding, how can we interpret our relationship with dogs as dominant or submissive?
 
To establish healthy relationships with dogs requires understanding. We must realise that communication is only possible between individuals of a same species; all other relationships function on approach, avoidance, interpretation, and trust. Dogs trust us not to hurt them and we trust dogs will not hurt us in return. We  must recognise that we are not superior or inferior to our dogs, we are simply different. Embrace your relationship, have fun, and give dominance the old heave-ho.

10/29/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour

​Reinforce Resilience 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT
In the last Blog, I tried to persuade readers to engage in a healthy discussion about what it means to be a dog professional. Today, we will take a look at learning and resilience. Note: to keep this article short, I have included a list of learning theories and people behind them at the end of this article.

In essence, learning theories are regrouped into six main theories: Behaviourism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, Design-based, Humanism, and Miscellaneous. Out of all the learning theories, most professionals rely on one, behaviourism (classical and operant conditioning). Did you know Albert Bandura, a Canadian, linked behaviourism and cognitivism with his social cognitive theory in the sixties?

In essence, social cognitive theory states "...that all animal action is based on fulfilling the psychological needs of feeling, emotion, and desire”. Social cognitive theory is based on the idea that animals (including people) learn by observing others, and this can only occur when personal, behavioural, and environmental factors are conducive to learning. Dogs can and do learn through social cognitive theory.

Another learning theory comes into play, attachment. Indeed, dogs have pre-set behaviours that allow them to attach to whatever is present during the critical period of social development. After this attachment period, dogs will learn to imitate and solve problems not only through association but also through social and emotional connectedness. Dogs who have formed bonds with humans are more likely to follow pointing gestures and visual cues to problem-solve (Virányi et al., 2008). In fact, when all these learning theories are put together, the side effect is increased resilience.

Reinforced Resilience Reduces Reaction.
Resilience is the capacity of a human or animal to recover quickly from difficulties or difficult situations; therefore, animal professionals should reinforce resilience, not behaviour. You might think this sounds strange, yet I assure you this is not an abstract concept. I introduced other learning theories into my practice fifteen years ago, and believe me, they work wonderfully. Actually, many dog research labs now focus on the social and cognitive capacities of our canine companions.

How does one reinforce resilience you might ask. The answer lies in your ability to place all the pieces of the puzzle together. In other words, the human must set the stage for other theories to interconnect. The first puzzle is the social cognitive learning theory model which looks like the image below.
In the social cognitive learning theory model, behavioural factors influence and are influenced by environmental factors; environmental factors influence and are influenced by personal factors (cognition, emotion, and biology); personal factors influence and are influenced by behaviour. All factors must connect and interact with one another in order for learning to take place (above). When both human and dog models connect through a secure attachment, both individuals can experience learning. Once the human-dog pair functions smoothly, resilience can and will increases. Why? Because the human can plan and set forth the environmental, behavioural, and personal factors required to trigger a response and then reinforce recovery. In other words, the human voluntarily works to decrease the dog's recovery time in any given situation by reinforcing the said recovery. As the dog gains insight and receives multiple levels of reinforcement for quick recovery, resilience will increase (below).The process of placing dogs into social situations in order to trigger personal and behavioural responses is termed situational inducement. Inducement should remain at the dog's threshold, for if the situation is too stressful, the dog will cease to learn. Remember, all three aspects of the social cognitive theory must function together in order to create a favourable learning environment. Furthermore, if situational inducement triggers high stress responses, the human-dog attachment will suffer and start to deteriorate. 

The objective of social cognitive and attachment theory is to let your dog know that you are there and that you will provide positive feedback. Your dog should think you are God, not because you have food, but because your relationship says I got your back. A resilient human and dog team is a powerful combination that can be exposed to any situation and bounce back physically, mentally, and emotionally without any long term negative effects.


Cooper, J.J., Ashton, C., Bishop, S., West, R., Mills, D.S. & Young, R.J. (2003). Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Animal Behaviour Science, United-Kingdom 81 229–244.
 
Holt, E.B. and H.C. (1931). Brown, Animal drive and the learning process, an essay toward radical empiricism. New York: H. Holt and Co.
 
Frank, H & Frank, M.G. (1982). Applied Animal Ethology. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam 507-525.
 
McLeod, S. A. (2009). Attachment Theory. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/attachment.html
 
Virányi, Z., Gácsi. M., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Belényi, B., Ujfalussy, D., & Miklósi, A. (2008). Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11:373–387. DOI 10.1007/s10071-007-0127-y
 

10/23/2014

  • 1 comment
  • Share

in Behaviour, Training

Dog Language 201 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

There is a lot of information on the web about dog behaviour, some more accurate than others. My objective with this article is not to write a long essay on the significance of dog behaviour and the latest discoveries, but rather make you, the reader,  think about why it is important to let dogs speak.

In essence, dog language is all about developing and maintaining harmonious relationships, not dominance or submission. Canines want the same thing humans want, which is to live, as much as possible, in a conflict free environment. To attain this goal, dogs have developed a complex language. The funny thing is, the dog and human language shares similarities. Both species use words which can hold various meaning depending on the context; furthermore, these words can be combined in different sequences in order to form alternate significances. Look at the sentences bellow.

My father was married before he died. 

My father died before he was married. 

Those same seven words, when placed in a different sequence, express a totally different message. Dogs can do the same with their language. Your canine companion can use avoidance, appeasement, stress release, agonistic, fear, etc. to form various meanings depending on the situation. Your dog can say to another dog "leave me alone, I'm scared, but I'll defend myself if you come closer" or can change the meaning by simply altering one or two behaviours and say "leave me alone, I'm scared, and I'll run away if you come closer". In the same situation, the dog can say many, many different things. The question is, is anybody listening?

The canine ethogram, aka dog dictionary, holds hundreds of behaviours (words) grouped in approximately twenty plus categories. These behaviours can be combined to form endless meaningful possibilities (sentences). When people interfere in dog communication they create more problems than they solve because they breakdown the dog-dog line of communication.

The family pet does not need to be told when to stop a play session or cease to sniff another dog's posterior. They can and will tell other dogs when and why to stop, and believe me, they will use those hundreds words to let others know how they feel.

It is important to let dogs speak in order to let them live well adjusted lives. For, without the ability to effectively communicate, dogs will find the necessary means to make their voices heard, and those means normally involve sutures and bandages. Have you ever stepped in between two arguing people only to be told to f*** off! Why did they tell you this? Because people need to resolve their conflicts before they can move on. Guess what? So do dogs!

On a final note, those who reduce dog communication to dominance and submission are condemning dogs to live a life of bitterness, frustration, aggression, fear, and confusion. If people explained human behaviour solely in terms of confidence and insecurity, all meaning would be lost and communication made pointless; people would be frustrated, angry, and confused. Language, whatever the species, is far more complex and needs to be learned if we are to live in a conflict free environment.

09/23/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour

Sociability Gene 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

Many years of observation lead me to believe that sociability is genetic, that is to say, we are born sociable or not. Instinctively the majority of people believe this statement without having scientific proof to back it up. Are they right? I think so. In my practice I’ve seen dogs (Canis Familiaris) with adequate socialisation develop behaviour problems. I’ve also seen dogs, isolated from stimuli during the critical period, be socially well adjusted. Recently I had the chance to observe four wolves (Canis Lupus) socialised according to a strict protocol. Three of them displayed typical fear behaviours wild wolves demonstrate, the fourth was simply fearful. The fearful wolf approached after a long session of encouragement. So, why is it that the recipe for socialisation failed? 

The canine socialisation period is well known to researchers and animal trainers/behaviourists. John Paul Scott and John L. Fuller introduced it in their book “Genetics and Social Behaviour of the Dog”, published in 1965. This period lasts from zero to sixteen weeks with a peak between the fourth and eighth week. We also know that a lack of exposure to stimuli during this period will create behavioural deficiencies. We will get back to this shortly. I am in no way questioning this theory, however, questions come to mind. If the dog is born sociable could the constant exposure to stimuli create behaviour problems? Are we creating hyper-reactive dogs by systematically sending them to puppy kindergarten? Is placing them in continuous social context positive or negative? Before answering these questions let's first look at the scientific research exploring sociability genes.

The Research

In 1997 Dr. Anthony Wynshaw-Boris from the National Human Genome Research Institute (USA) discovered a gene responsible for social behaviour in whiskery mice (
Mus Musculus Musculus), a highly sociable laboratory mouse best known for its whisker cleaning behaviour. The gene studied is named dishevelled and came from a knockout group of mice. Researchers found three versions of this gene, dishevelled 1,2 and 3. In order to understand the role of this gene Dr. Wynshaw-Boris removed dishevelled-1 from the whiskery mouse. To his astonishment the mouse grew normally, however, once adult he noticed the whiskers on the mouse were poorly groomed. The team wondered why.

By closely observing the animals, they noticed a decrease in social interaction. They also noticed that the mice had difficulty eliminating exterior stimuli and concentrating on one specific stimulus. These same asocial behaviours are observed in humans suffering from psychiatric disorders such as autism or schizophrenia. Against all expectations the genetically modified mice interacted, nestled, slept and groomed less. Visibly, something had changed in the group. The mice had become asocial. Was the gene removed responsible for sociability? The conclusion of the study wasn’t clear. However, the facts demonstrated that social interactions were gone, their behaviours had changed and this gene was responsible.

A few years later, in 1999, Dr. Tom Insel and Larry Young from Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (USA) published research in the journal Nature. The goal of the study was to discover the mechanisms of a neurotransmitter responsible for social attraction and intimacy, the hormone vasopressin. This time researchers created a social mouse by inserting the gene from a species of prairie vole (Microtus Ochrogaster) known for its sociability and fidelity. The hormone vasopressin was injected in a species of polygamist and asocial mice. The new transgenic species demonstrated the same social and gregarious behaviour as the prairie voles. It was the first time a gene was identified as responsible for social behaviour.

Discoveries did not end there. In 2001 a study published in the journal Science demonstrated that only one gene could regulate social behaviour in red fire ants (Solenopsis Invicta). Researchers from the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia (USA) Michael Krieger and Kenneth Ross, discovered a gene responsible for the exchange of information allowing ants to interact socially, a protein named Gp-9. This protein functions by allowing ants to send and receive olfactory signals (pheromones) used to recognize each other as a member of the same colony.

The most extraordinary discovery was published in August 2003 in the journal Medical Genetics. The researchers Teresa Doyle and Ursula Bellugi from the Salk Institute, San Diego, California (USA) in collaboration with Julie Korenberger and John Graham from the UCLA and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (USA) published research on children affected by Williams syndrome. Children suffering from this syndrome have an extremely extroverted and hyper-social personality. They also have cardiovascular problems, particular physical and facial characteristics, and a certain mental delay. Adults suffering from this syndrome demonstrate unusual capabilities for language despite reduced cognitive abilities. 

Williams syndrome is rare. One out of twenty thousand people are affected. It is the consequence of the absence of twenty genes from one chromosome located on the seventh pair. Virtually every person affected by the syndrome lacks the same series of genes. Researchers discovered that children with Williams syndrome got very high marks when administered sociability tests. These tests included the ability to recognize faces and names, the desire to please, empathy and social attraction. In the same study it was discovered that one child retained one of the twenty genes usually missing. After this discovery, a new behavioural test was administered to the little girl. Surprisingly, she did not demonstrate the social extroverted characteristics other children with Williams syndrome demonstrated. She was rather introverted, lacked sociability and was fearful of strangers. The results implied that the presence of this gene altered the hyper-sociability typically observed in people with Williams. Researchers concluded the study by saying they were not sure if the gene involved in regulating social behaviour applied to the general population or simply to those affected with Williams syndrome.

Conclusion
Although not conclusive, research demonstrates that a sociability gene, or series of genes, could exist. So back to our questions, does overexposing genetically social puppies to highly social situations hinder or help development? In the near future, the answer will undoubtedly yes. I personally believe over socialising dogs hinders development and has the potential to create behaviour problems. All the while, an anti-social dog does benefit from regular low intensity social interaction. After all, being social means dogs have the ability to use their species specific language in the situations they have chosen; conversely, if dogs do not wish to be social in a certain situation does not mean they are systematically anti-social, it might simply mean they do not wish to interact with this specific individual at this specific moment. 

09/04/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour

Dogs Socialization 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

A behaviour problem is the physical expression of a negative mental state. Behaviour problems impair normal function, i.e. the dog cannot eat because it spends its time chasing imaginary flies. What has caused the original dysfunction can be the result of poor genetics, miscommunication, neglect, or abuse. Behaviour problems occur when humans fails to recognize the early signs of mental dysfunction. Knowing this, a question comes to mind, how do we prevent behaviour problems from developing?

The socialization period was well identified and thoroughly discussed in Fuller and Scott’s book Genetics and the Social Behaviour of the Dog (1965). From their research, it was discovered that puppies need to experience various stimuli before the age of three months in order to securely withstand life’s events. In other words, what puppies do not experience during this critical period they will fear as adults. This corresponds with Konrad Lorenz’s theory of imprinting; it mentions a species acquires his identity during a critical period, in dogs this social period closes at approximately 16 weeks.

Socialization, or imprinting, and habituation happen according to a certain recipe. Take a little bit of social contact from dogs, people, and other animals, mix in various sounds, smells, objects and experiences, throw in positive training techniques, simmer for a few months, and voilà! A well balanced adult dog! Behaviour problems arise when the instructions were not followed and ingredients were forgotten, or omitted all together.

Socialization Problems
Puppies spend most of the critical period with their breeders. Consequently, the breeder’s role is to provide positive stimuli and social contact to his brood. When puppies are exposed to a variety of people, animals, sounds, smells and positive experiences, dogs become confident, well balanced, and adjusted adults. In the best of worlds, puppies leaving their homes between seven and eight weeks are properly socialized, and sold to canine savvy owners.

Here are a few documented situations which can create behaviour problems down the line. 1. Separation. Dogs are pulled to early from the litter, or were not presented with various stimuli during the critical period. 2. Vaccination. Veterinarians tell their clients not to expose their puppy to other dogs before the vaccination protocol is completed. Unfortunately, this event occurs after the socialization period has ended. Introducing puppies to adult dogs is perfectly safe; considering most of the adult dog population is vaccinated. Obviously, one has to use common sense and refrain from contact if the adult dog exhibits signs of illness.

3. Over-socialisation. Large groups of adult dogs can seriously overwhelm puppies. The purpose of socialization is to learn which behaviours are considered normal and expected as adults; conversely, groups of puppies cannot teach each other manners they themselves know nothing about. The human equivalent would be to place young children together in groups and let them grow up in the hopes they will teach each other how to behave as adults. Adult supervision is not only required, it is mandatory. The same thing goes for dogs; puppies need to be in contact with well adjusted adult dogs in very small groups! Well adjusted adult dogs teach youngsters how to display species-specific behaviours.

Socialization Solutions
As seen above, socializing puppies is like baking a cake; one has to follow certain steps, at certain times, in order to obtain the appropriate finished product. If breeders have not exposed puppies to various situations, owners can offer those opportunities; unfortunately, they have very little time to do so. Owners have approximately four weeks to develop their dog’s social skills. During this short time, owners should present stimuli they will unlikely encounter as adult dogs. Remember, dogs will fear what they don’t know; this means traffic, fast moving objects, people of different shapes, sizes, ethnicities, noises, smells, and living creatures are potentially life threatening situations in the dog’s mind.

Owners can socialize their puppies in different ways. They can bring them to puppy socialisation classes, stand in front of big stores, go to dog parks, visit a family member, or simply expose the dog to various situations and give them treats for positive responses. Everybody wants to pet the new puppy, so why not walk around and ask people to interact, while you control the environment. When you practice these techniques, or any other for that matter, one has to be conscious of their dog’s emotional state of mind. Owners should pull their puppies away if they get tired, overwhelmed, or scared. Socialization is a question of balance; too much, or too little, of a good thing, can be a bad thing.

08/21/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour

Dog Language 101 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

Dictionaries state 1. The ability to communicate, to establish a relationship with others, which brings me to the word communicate. 2. To give knowledge, sharing with someone. 3. To be in a relationship, in contact, or corresponding with someone. Hence, one can conclude from these definitions that we communicate with our dogs; however, what are we telling them?

Let us look at the Alpha Roll as an example. Does turning Fido on his back and holding him there say: I am Alpha, submit to me, or else! On the other hand, does it mean: Periodically I will scare you, with no apparent reason, by tossing you on your back until you become inhibited. If you chose the second option, you are a champion. What we communicate to Fido is a question of perception, and in this case, we must look at it from the dog’s point of view. To accomplish this, we must understand the canine dictionary.

Dominance is an intraspecific concept; meaning to dominate the dog one must be able to talk the same language, which is impossible. I cannot lift my tail, pivot my ears or raise my hackles. Submission amongst dogs is voluntary, or there is a fight. I have never seen a dog, or wolf, take his adversary by the scruff of the neck, flip him on his back until he submitted. I will repeat, the animal will submit 
VOLUNTARILY, or there is a dominance conflict.

To illustrate this point let us look at this example. An elephant and a buffalo challenge one another in the Savannah; I ask who is dominating whom? The answer is, neither nor, and both at the same time. For, in their respective heads, they are displaying dominance behaviours. In this situation, there is no communication since the definition states: Establishing a relationship with others, being in a relationship.

In our example, the buffalo is trying to dominate the elephant by lowering his head and showing his horns. The elephant is displaying dominance by opening his ears and raising his trunk. They are demonstrating dominance by showing behaviours they usually exhibit to other members of their group. We see communication is not possible. The buffalo is not dominating the elephant, because the latter does not understand the behaviours. With this new understanding, how can we interpret our relationship with dogs as being dominance and submission?

The dog spends his time interpreting our behaviours because he does not understand our language. Here is another example. You must cut your dog’s nails, and he does not want to. You forcefully 
immobilize him until he stops moving and accepts your manipulations. My question is did you dominate him, of course not! In his head you scared him and not being able to run away, he froze. Remember, a dog faced with a situation, can do one of three things, freeze, flight or fight. Although the majority of canines will prefer flight, the alternative is usually “fight.”

Most dog trainers understand the dog’s physical language, but unfortunately, few know about the emotional language. Calming and avoidance signals are an integral part of the canine vocabulary, and understanding them is necessary for proper communication. This understanding allows us to prevent behaviour problems, which are, more often 
than not, a result of poor communication. Calming and avoidance signals are fast and somewhat difficult to observe, but once mastered, one can avoid many unfortunate situations. These signals are turning eye, turning head, turning body, tongue flicking, freezing, closing the mouth, ground sniffing, sitting, laying down, panting, yawning, play bow, and whale eyes.

Let us go back to our nail cutting example. The owner is on top of the dog trying to 
immobilize him, the dog yawns, wags the tip of his tail and invariably turns his head to avoid his owner’s stare. In other words, the dog is trying to tell you he is scared and does not understand what you expect of him. Remember, in his world, no other dog would dare do such a thing. In our example, Fido could make the association between pain and you, and think you are a potential danger.

Establishing a healthy relationship with an animal demands a maximum understanding of his ethogram. We must realize that communication is only possible between species exhibiting the same physical and emotional behaviour; all other relationships function on respect and positive associations. Preventing behaviour problems starts by recognizing we are not superior, or inferior, to our dogs, we are merely different; as Charles Darwin said, “Differences create diversity!”

08/13/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour

Dogs Read Human Emotions - The Left Gaze Bias 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

Pet owners often say My dog knows when I feel good or bad. This statement remained unverified by the scientific community, till now. A recent report published in the scientific journal New Scientist (Guo, 2008), researchers discovered dogs do indeed read the human face as we do, that is, from left to right, to gain emotional insight. The process of reading emotions is described by the researchers as the Left Gaze Bias or LGB.

LGB is the process by which people validate emotions by scanning the face from left to right, with an emphasis on the person’s right side. The reason for this bias is the asymmetrical structure of the face. Remember biology 101, the left hemisphere of the brain controls the right side of the body and vice verse. Therefore, our brains are scanning for the side of the face controlled by the emotional side of the brain, hence, the other person’s right side or from my perspective, their left side.


       Photo 1                              Photo 2
   
Look at both images. Photo 1 is the left side of the face copied and flipped. Photo 2 is the right side of the face copied and flipped. Which face appears happier? If you said photo 2, you are experiencing LGB. The subtle emotional differences between the left and right side of one’s face are difficult to observe without this trickery, but our brains have learned to make this discrepancy, allowing for a more accurate emotional assessment.

When presented with pictures of human faces, monkeys, canines, or inanimate objects, our furry companions demonstrate the LGB only towards human faces. Dogs do not exhibit the left to right facial scanning when presented with other dogs, animals, or inanimate objects. In terms of behaviour modification and training, the LGB proves dogs can and do read human emotions; therefore, pet owners can use this information to identify their dog’s emotional state and redirect behaviour by readjusting their own emotions. This process is referred to as emotional projection and is the essence of my practice.

Reference
- Guo, K. Left Gaze Bias. New Scientist, U.K. October 2008

07/18/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour

Dog Aggression 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

Most dog owners know about the physical language of dogs; a raised tail and ears mean dominance, while a lowered tail and ears mean submission. However, few know about the emotional language dogs’ exhibit. Physical language presented as appeasement and avoidance signals make up the ethogram, aka canine dictionary. This dictionary must be understood in order to develop a secure relationship with the dog, which in turn will reduce the risks of bites.

Appeasement and avoidance signals are intended for those purposes. Appeasement signals serve to minimize conflict, while avoidance signals are intended at avoiding conflict in the first place. Appeasement signals like stretching, yawning, tongue flicking, pawing, and such, are displayed to the opponent (human, dog or other) in order to avoid stop conflicts before they escalate. Avoidance signals are displayed at an opponent when a dog tries to avoid a conflict. He signals his intentions, turning eyes, turning head, curving, sitting, pretend sniffing, hoping to avoid the escalating conflict. 

When confronted with a stressful situation a dog will respond in one of three ways; freeze, flight or fight, in that order. Dogs do not want to be hurt; their survival would be compromised if they wanted to fight all the time. Knowing this changes our perception of aggression and dog bites. Canines want to avoid being hurt and signal their emotional distress through behaviours that owners do not understand and as a result, they may get bitten.

Aggression in dogs is normal; after all, they are predators. It is the lack of understanding that puts people in jeopardy. Owners punish the puppy for showing his teeth at grandmother; they tell him “No” when he growls. For the dog, these are normal signs of distress and people punish them out, leaving the dog with no other option but to bite. Remember freeze, flight or fight! Given the right circumstances, the dog will bite, no questions asked.

Pausing (freeze) behaviour shows the dog is uncomfortable, stress is building up and he must make a decision “Should I stay, or run away? ” In most cases the dog will run away (flight), however, when the environment prevents him from escaping, biting (fight) becomes an option, actually, the only option left!

Here is an example. A dog is playing on the balcony with his favourite toy. The neighbour walks in the yard. The dog pauses, tongue flicks, stands, circles and lies down again. The Neighbour interprets this as the dog being ok (he laid down again). He walks up the stairs and the dog bites his leg as he passes by. The dog gave all the right signals, unfortunately, the person failed to recognize them, and got bitten. Look at the situation from the dog’s point of view. When the person entered the yard, the dog paused (decision-making), tongue flicked (calming signal), circled (curving = 1st avoidance signal) and laid back down (down = 2nd avoidance signal). After reading this information, one can see the situation was preventable.

Through artificial selection, humans have changed the dogs' fixed action patterns (chain of behaviours working towards a specific goal), breeding down certain traits their wild ancestors still exhibit. Such behavioural faults are killed, dismember and eat. One must understand that these genetic traits are not removed, they are simply dormant. Dogs retain their predatory behaviours and under the right conditions, genetics will always over-ride training.

Physically speaking, the consequences of dog bites are different, the size of the dog being the main factor. However, emotionally speaking, the result is the same. Dogs are euthanized and victims are scarred for life. To avoid dog bites, prevention through education remains the best option.

06/06/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour, Training

Feral Dogs of Sochi 

By Gaby Dufresne-Cyr, CBT

In light of the Sochi dog cull and the media attention it has received, I urge people to inquire and research the stray dog topic in order to look at these events with an educated mind. The dog sleeping in your bed is a poor representation of the dog population around the world.

In 1990, the World Health Organisation published a document in order to establish guidelines for dog population management. In this document, the WHO states "Dog populations may rapidly grow to a point where the health risks of humans becomes serious and the environment begins suffering considerably." (1990).

If you have visited any of the Central or South American, African, Indian, Asian, Australian, or certain European countries, I need not explain this reality any further. Heck, ask any Detroiter what their stray dog population looks like and they will tell you they are everywhere. Detroit residents consider stray dogs as dangerous and unhealthy.

The free roaming unrestricted dog population poses a serious health risk to humans (OIE, 2009). In Central and South America, people die from rabies every day. There is simply no economical, social, or cultural reason to own or adopt a dog for residents of these countries. In many parts of the world, dogs are simply considered pests and dealt with as such.

I do not support the unnecessary killing of dogs; however, I have seen many unrestricted dogs cause environmental damages and transmit parasites to tourists unaware of the problem. The reality of the matter is, the global stray dog population does pose a health threat to humans and the environment in which they live. Dogs on the prowl kill livestock, spread waste, kill wildlife, destroy the environment, transmit diseases, and propagate parasites.

Sochi might have demonstrated poor judgement in regards to its dog control and management strategy; conversely, if we cry wolf and do not offer tangible solutions, we are as guilty as they are. When the Olympics end and everybody has left, stray dog populations will return to Sochi once again and when this topic ceases to make headlines, the world will turn its proverbial head and pretend the problem has disappeared. In order to prevent this, we must set aside our socio-cultural, political, and religious beliefs and address the problem of stray dogs on a worldwide scale.

Our responsibility as an educated population is to analyse and offer long term solutions. The WHO and OIE have proposed solutions to help us achieve our goals, and it is our responsibility to implement these practices in our own civilised communities before we can condemn others for doing something we do not agree with.

The stray dog population control controversy triggers an emotional response in us, in me; however, without proper education on responsible ownership, adequate infrastructures, and effective management strategies, the problem will remain.

One thing is for sure, we cannot save the entire stray dog population, so what do we do? We capture stray dogs and place them in fancy no kill shelters in the hopes someone, somewhere, will adopt them? Then again, how can capturing stray animals and condemning them to years of incarceration be considered humane?

References
- World Health Organisation and World Society for the Protection of Animals. (1990). Guidelines for Dog Population Management. Geneva. WHO/ZOON/90.166p.

- OIE, World Organisation For Animal Health. (2009). Stray Dog Population Control. Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission. Paris. 309p.

05/07/2014

  • Leave a comment
  • Share

in Behaviour

« First ‹ Prev 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

© Dogue Shop | Updated February 2, 2023 | E-MAIL US | 514-573-4093

  • Log out
Powered by Breederoo

Terms